📈
Data Use Community
  • HIV Treatment Continuity Technology Intervention Framework (TIF)
    • Outside the Visit
      • Pre Appointment Support Interventions
        • QI-PM Pre Appointment Support
        • Pre-Appointment Reminders (Nigeria)
        • Pre-Appointment Support (South Sudan)
      • Population-Based Scheduling Interventions
        • CMIS Pre Appointment Support & Population Based Scheduling (Eswatini)
      • Congestion Redistribution
        • Lighthouse Trust's Community-based ART Retention and Suppression (CARES) App in Malawi
        • Differentiated Service Delivery Models Support in UgandaEMR
      • Pooling Patient Data
        • Unique Identity (Botswana)
        • Data Analysis and Visualizations (Tanzania)
      • Anticipatory Guidance
    • During the Visit
      • Proactive Adherence Counselling Interventions
        • Missed Appointments Lists (Haiti)
        • AI Predictive Adherence Counseling (South Africa)
        • Machine Learning to Predict Interruption in Treatment (Mozambique)
        • Predictive model for Interruption in Treatment in Patient Treatment Response Dashboard (Nigeria)
      • Reactive Adherence Counseling Interventions
        • Reactive Adherence Counseling (Haiti)
        • Adherence Dashboard (Kenya)
      • Visit Management Interventions
        • EMR Visit Management (Uganda)
    • Missed Appointment Interventions
      • Missed Appointment Reminder
        • Two-way Texting Patient reminders and tracking (Zimbabwe)
        • Patient Reminders and Tracking (Kenya)
        • EMR-ART Missed Appointment Reminder (Ethiopia)
        • Person-Centered Public Health for HIV Treatment (PCPH)
        • Missed Appointment Management (Western Kenya)
        • Rwanda Biomedical Center EMR (RBC EMR)
      • Intensive Outreach Intervention
        • Missed Appointments and Intensive Outreach (Kenya)
        • Patient Tracing (Ethiopia)
        • Identification of Missed Appointments (Malawi)
        • Missed Appointments and Intensive Outreach (Nigeria)
      • Targeted Adherence Support Interventions
        • Enhancing HIV Treatment Continuity: Innovations and Data Use in Kenya's Health Information Systems
  • Patient Identity Management Toolkit
    • Modules
      • Key Considerations in Matching
        • Background
        • Phase 1 - Planning and Analysis
        • Phase 2 - Implementation
        • Phase 3 - Review and Refine
        • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
      • Matching with Biometrics
        • Overview
        • Role in Identity Management
        • Choosing Biometric Characteristics and Modalities
          • Reviewing Studies and Comparisons
          • Reviewing Standards and Guidelines
          • Additional Topics to Consider
        • Trends and Developments
          • Current Trends
          • Future Developments
        • Closing
        • References
        • Glossary
    • Learn from Others
      • Map of Country Implementations
      • Reaching Health Standards and Creating Client Registry in Haiti (2021)
      • Introduction to Biometrics for Patient Identity, Presented by Simprints (2022)
      • Utilizing Biometrics for Unique Patient Identification (UPID) in Côte d’Ivoire (2022)
      • Establishing a Unique Patient Identification (UPI) Framework in Kenya (2023)
      • Malawi Master Patient Index (2023)
      • Piloting a Patient Identity Management System (PIMS) in Haiti (2023)
      • Leveraging Biometrics to Scale a Patient Identity Management System (PIMS) in Nigeria (2023)
      • Leveraging Adaptive Machine Learning Algorithms for Patient Identification in Zimbabwe (2023)
      • OpenHIE23 Meeting in Malawi. Patient Identity Management Collaborative Hackathon. (2023)
      • Strengthening Patient Identity Management (PIM) by Integrating a Client Registry in Rwanda (2023)
      • Patient Identity Management Initiatives in Ethiopia (2023)
      • Patient Identity Management Initiatives in Botswana (2024)
    • References
  • How to Provide Feedback and Input on the TIF and Toolkit
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Patient Identity Management Toolkit
  2. Learn from Others

Establishing a Unique Patient Identification (UPI) Framework in Kenya (2023)

Data Use Community, February 2023

PreviousUtilizing Biometrics for Unique Patient Identification (UPID) in Côte d’Ivoire (2022)NextMalawi Master Patient Index (2023)

Last updated 1 year ago

The Data Use Community (DUC) is an open global community passionate about improving health and healthcare data sharing. It is a forum of virtual meetings and an online discussion board for sharing and learning from peers and country experiences. On February 22, 2023, Dr. Joseph Sitienei with the Ministry of Health in Kenya shared the government’s experience establishing a unique patient identification process and framework. Below is a summary written by the DUC Secretariat of what was understood at the time of sharing.

Background

As individuals move throughout the health system, it becomes difficult to understand and track the entirety of health services delivered and received – leading to duplication of services, medical errors, and poor patient management. Systems and processes to support unique patient identification (UPI) can help with ensuring that individuals receive the continuity of care needed for better health outcomes. With Kenya’s implementation of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and focused care approach, the Ministry of Health (MoH) recognized that UPI has the potential to strengthen patient management and quality of care, promote efficiency in service delivery, support disease surveillance, and advance efforts towards the digitalization and integration of shared health records.

To support Kenya’s efforts to deploy UPI processes at health facilities, the MoH developed the which outlines the governance and systems requirements necessary for successful implementation. The Partnership Coordination Framework was used to guide the co-creation approach for developing the framework (Diagram 1).

Diagram 1: Partnership Coordination Framework

Technical Approach

Kenya uses a distributed generation approach with the UPI being “generated at the point of assignment without any reference to a central authority”. The diagram below outlines the workflow for how a patient is registered and verified when entering a health facility (Diagram 2).

Diagram 2: Patient Registration and Verification Flow

As part of the UPI process, queries may be sent to both the local patient registry (e.g. health facility) and Kenya’s Master Patient Registry (KMPR) to determine whether or not to register an individual as a new patient. The diagram below highlights KMPR’s architecture and workflow (Diagram 3).

Diagram 3: Kenya’s Master Patient Registry Architecture

The technical components and processes used to generate UPIs are mentioned below (Table 1).

Table 1: Technology Components

Impact & Challenges

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the KMPR was used to capture individual information as part of the vaccine registration process – bringing the total number of registered to 22 million or nearly half of all Kenyan citizens. While efforts to scale continue, there are several challenges worth noting:

  • Existing health system infrastructure not optimally configured for UPI with disparate health information systems, including paper-based that are not set up to capture unique numbers;

  • Limited resources to implement advanced technologies like biometrics to capture individual identifiers; and

  • Change management issues due to lack of awareness from patients and health providers on the benefits of UPI.

Lessons Learned

There are several takeaways from Kenya’s experience implementing UPI processes at health facilities.

  • Gaining stakeholder trust is critical when collecting sensitive information. Patients and health workers need to be engaged when developing the process, so that there is buy-in from the start.

  • Leveraging existing resources can help move the process along, while at the same time investments are being made to strengthen the infrastructure and processes.

  • Strong political will can mobilize increased resources and investments. The government’s commitment to digitalizing the health information system has supported the passing of an e-Health bill that will anchor many of the requirements outlined in the Health Sector Unique Identification Framework into law.

Looking Ahead

The Kenyan government took a variety of steps to help ensure the implementation and acceptability of a UPI system to uniquely identify patients and deliver optimum health care. These steps included leveraging the country’s national person identification system (KMPR) and involving the community to “own” the process. As a next step, the MoH will work to scale the UPI country-wide and continue to explore other technologies for identifying individuals such as biometrics.

References

For more information on the experiences in Kenya, please visit the DUC presentation .

Presentation by Dr. Joseph Sitienei, Ministry of Health - Kenya

here
DUC Meeting February 22, 2023:
Health Sector Unique Identification Framework
Health Sector Unique Identification Framework,